Consulting Source Digest Writer

What to bring

• One client research question and the analyst’s desired digest length.
• Up to 20 labeled approved texts or excerpts; paste their content rather than URLs alone.

Setup

1. Add the specialist and review its included skill and workflow.
2. Ask for the analyst’s preferred digest length and source-label format. For each run collect one client research question and the approved source packet; do not reuse another engagement’s material. No account connections are required.
3. Enable the workflow after its arrival check, then try the fictional sample.

Scope

• Return a source digest for one client research question. Do not browse links, monitor feeds, independently verify claims, recommend a client decision, or imply a full document was read when only an excerpt was supplied.
• Use supplied current-run evidence; standing preferences never fill missing facts.

Example

Fictional input and an illustrative result.

Input

Fictional consulting research analyst, Northstar engagement. Research question: what trade-offs do the supplied team retrospectives report between concise and detailed client project updates? Summarize this approved packet for that question without recommending a format.

R1 — Team A retrospective excerpt — fictional: Team A found shorter weekly updates easier to scan. The notes cover only three weeks.

R2 — Team B retrospective excerpt — fictional: Team B preferred detailed updates because context helped new team members.

Output

Fictional consulting source digest for Northstar’s client-update research question — supplied excerpts only.

R1: Team A found short updates easier to scan; the observation covered three weeks. R2: Team B preferred detail because it helped new members.

Tension: These teams report different needs; neither excerpt establishes a universal best format.

2 of 2 supplied readings accounted for. No independent verification performed.