IP reputation investigation console for security teams
Paste any suspicious IP address and get a side by side verdict from AbuseIPDB and VirusTotal, plus a shared log of every past investigation.
I want an IP investigation console my security team opens whenever a suspicious address shows up in a log, an alert, or a customer complaint. It is one screen: a search box at the top, verdict cards below it, and a shared investigation log the team can search by IP address.
The search box accepts a single IP address or several at once, pasted as a list separated by commas, spaces, or newlines. Each address renders its own verdict card. Build the card from AbuseIPDB Check IP Reputation and put the abuse confidence score front and center, alongside total reports, the number of distinct reporters, the last reported date shown as a relative time, the ISP, the usage type, the domain, the country, and whether the address is a known Tor exit node.
Next to that, show a second opinion panel built from VirusTotal Get an IP Address Report: how many engines flag the address as malicious or suspicious out of the total that scanned it, the community reputation score, the network owner and ASN, and the country. When the two sources disagree, for example AbuseIPDB scores above 75 while no VirusTotal engine flags the address, or the reverse, call it out explicitly on the card with a short line naming which source is the outlier. Disagreement is the single thing I most want to see, so do not bury it in the layout.
Expanding a card reveals the full report history from AbuseIPDB Get Abuse Reports. That operation paginates, so give the expanded view real pagination controls using page and perPage, defaulting to 25 per page and allowing up to 100, and rely on lastPage and nextPageUrl to know when to stop rather than guessing. Each row shows the report date, the reporter's country, the reporter comment, and the abuse categories translated from their numeric IDs into readable names, for example 18 Brute-Force, 22 SSH, 14 Port Scan, 4 DDoS, and 10 Email Spam.
From that same expanded card I want to file my own report using AbuseIPDB Report IP. Give me a category multi-select that displays the readable category names while submitting the numeric IDs, a comment box, and a confirmation step before it sends, since reports are public and hard to walk back. Remind me in that dialog to strip private data out of the comment. After a successful submission, refresh the card so my report shows up in the history and the totals update.
The app keeps its own investigation log so the team stops re-checking the same address. Every lookup records the IP, who ran it, and when. On each card let the person save a conclusion, one of clean, monitor, block, or reported, plus a free-text note explaining the reasoning. The log is its own section on the page, searchable by IP address. When someone searches an address that has been investigated before, surface the previous conclusion and note directly on the card, with who reached it and how long ago, before they redo work someone already did.
Color-code the abuse confidence score into four bands: 0 is clean, 1 to 25 is low, 26 to 75 is suspicious, and 76 to 100 is malicious. Apply the band color to the score itself and to the card so a wall of cards is scannable at a glance. When the usage type places an address in data center, web hosting, transit, or VPN space, or when it is a Tor exit node, show a warning on the card explaining that shared ranges score high because many unrelated users share them, and that a high score there is not evidence this specific traffic was malicious.
Both providers meter usage, so be careful with quota. Never fire a lookup on every keystroke: only search on submit, and when several addresses are pasted, look them up in a small batch with a little spacing between calls instead of firing them all at once. Surface the remaining daily quota from the AbuseIPDB rate limit response headers somewhere visible, and handle a quota exceeded response with a clear message rather than a silent failure. Both APIs wrap their payload in a top-level data object, and IPv6 addresses must be URL-encoded before going into a query string. If VirusTotal has no record of an address, render the AbuseIPDB verdict on its own with a note saying VirusTotal has no record, instead of failing the whole card.
What does this prompt do?
- Paste one or several IP addresses and get a verdict card for each, showing the abuse confidence score, how many times it has been reported, when it was last reported, and who owns the network.
- Puts a second opinion from VirusTotal next to every verdict and flags it when the two sources disagree, so you know which addresses need a closer look.
- Opens the full report history for any address, including what other people reported it for and their comments, and lets you file your own report without leaving the page.
- Keeps a searchable record of every investigation your team has run, including who looked at it, what they decided, and why, so nobody re-checks the same address twice.
What do I need to use this?
- An AbuseIPDB account. The free tier covers a normal day of lookups.
- A VirusTotal account for the second opinion panel.
- A list of the addresses you want to check, or just paste them in as they come up.
- Nothing else to set up. The investigation log lives inside the app.
How can I customize it?
- Move the score bands if your team draws the line between suspicious and malicious somewhere other than 26 and 76.
- Add your own conclusion labels beyond clean, monitor, block, and reported to match how your team tracks decisions.
- Change how many report entries load per page, or turn off the shared hosting and VPN warning if your environment never deals with those ranges.
FAQs
Do I need a paid AbuseIPDB plan?
Why do AbuseIPDB and VirusTotal sometimes disagree about the same address?
Why does the app warn me about hosting and VPN addresses?
Can I report an address from inside the app?
Does it work with IPv6 addresses?
Related templates
Paste a suspicious IP, hostname, or certificate and get one profile page with Censys detail, VirusTotal reputation, history, and one-click Jira escalation.
Paste raw log lines or a list of blocked IPs, check every address for existing abuse reports, assign categories, and file the whole batch in one reviewed pass.
Replace the firewall request spreadsheet with a board that checks every address against threat intelligence before anyone approves a change.
Every weekday we scan new security certificates for fake versions of your domain, check them for known abuse, and alert your team in Teams.
Every 15 minutes, forwarded phishing reports get traced back to the server that really sent them, with a verdict in Slack and the worst senders reported.
Every 15 minutes, phishing emails your staff forward in get checked against 70+ security engines and summarised in Slack, with a compliance log kept automatically.
Stop losing the reasoning behind past IP verdicts.
Give your team one place to check an address, see both sources side by side, and record what they concluded.