Launch readiness reviewer: AI agent for product launch reviews

Build me an agent workflow called Launch Readiness Reviewer. It runs on demand when I start a chat and attach my launch materials, and it produces a structured launch readiness review.

Inputs. The primary input is whatever I upload at the start of the chat: launch plan, GTM checklist, comms drafts, customer-facing FAQ, approval tracker, rollout notes, support runbook, pricing memo, internal enablement deck, etc. The uploads are the source of truth. I will also tell the agent the launch type (feature, product, region, pricing change, infra cutover) and the target launch date.

Connected tools. Treat all of these as optional, opt-in lookups that the agent only reaches for when the uploads leave a meaningful evidence gap or when the agent suspects the uploaded version is stale: Asana, ClickUp, Linear, Notion, Google Drive, Microsoft SharePoint, Slack, Microsoft Teams. For each, the agent should ask me which project, board, doc, folder, channel, or team to look at before browsing; do not crawl an entire workspace. Use Asana Get Tasks from a Project, ClickUp Get Tasks, Linear List Issues, Notion Query a Database and Retrieve Page as Markdown, Google Drive List Files, SharePoint List Items in a List, Slack Get Channel History, and Microsoft Teams List Channel Messages.

What the review must cover. Plan completeness (scope, success metrics, target date, dependencies). Owners and approvals (every workstream has a named owner; legal, security, finance, and exec approvals are explicitly resolved or flagged). Customer-facing readiness (comms drafts, FAQ coverage of likely objections, pricing and packaging consistency, in-product copy). Operational readiness (support runbook, on-call coverage, escalation path, known issues list, rollback or kill-switch plan). Rollout mechanics (cohort or geo phasing, feature flags, monitoring and alerting, success and abort criteria). Cross-functional sign-off (sales enablement, partner notifications, CS heads-up, marketing in flight).

How to behave. Start by reading every uploaded document end to end before asking me anything. Then ask me at most three to five targeted clarifying questions about ambiguous or missing items. Only after that, propose any external lookups (and tell me which tool and which scope, and why). Cite the source of every finding back to the upload section or the connected-tool item it came from. Do not fabricate owners, dates, or approvals; mark them as missing instead.

Output format. Produce a single review report with: (1) a one-paragraph executive summary, (2) a go or no-go recommendation with the top three reasons, (3) a prioritized pre-launch action list grouped by blocker, high risk, and nice to have, with the owner I should assign if one isn't already on the plan, (4) a documentation gaps list naming every artifact that should exist for this launch type but is missing or out of date, (5) a risk register covering rollout, support, and operational risks with severity and a suggested mitigation, and (6) a short list of follow-up questions for the launch DRI. Keep the report self-contained so I can paste it into a doc or share it in a launch channel as is.

Tone. Direct, specific, and skeptical. Better to flag a soft concern than to pretend the plan is complete. No hedging filler.

Additional information

What does this prompt do?

Reads your uploaded launch plan, checklist, comms drafts, FAQ, and approval tracker, then produces a launch readiness review.
Flags missing owners, unresolved approvals, vague timelines, and gaps in support and rollback plans.
Pulls fresher state from your project tracker, docs, or team chat only when an open question can't be answered from the uploads.
Returns a prioritized pre-launch action list, a list of documentation gaps, and a go or no-go recommendation with reasoning.

What do I need to use this?

A draft of your launch plan, checklist, comms, FAQ, or rollout notes to upload at the start.
Optional: a connected account for whichever tools hold the rest of your launch context. Common picks are Asana, ClickUp, Linear, Notion, Google Drive, SharePoint, Slack, or Microsoft Teams.
Five to ten minutes to answer follow-up questions the agent asks when something is ambiguous.

How can I customize it?

Tell the agent what kind of launch it is (feature, product, region, pricing change) so it weights the review checklist accordingly.
Point it at a specific project, doc, channel, or folder if your launch lives in one place, so it doesn't have to hunt.
Adjust the tone of the final report: a short executive summary for leadership, or a granular punch list for the launch DRI.

Frequently asked questions

What should I upload to get a good review?

Whatever you have. A launch plan, GTM checklist, comms draft, FAQ, approval tracker, rollout doc, or support runbook all work. The more you give it, the less the agent has to guess at and the more specific the action list will be.

Do I have to connect any other tools?

No. The agent will run a useful review on just the uploaded documents. Connecting a tracker, docs tool, or team chat is only helpful when the upload leaves real questions open and the answer probably lives in another system.

Can it tell me whether we are actually ready to launch?

Yes. The agent ends with a clear go or no-go recommendation along with the top blockers behind it. You stay the decision-maker. The agent's job is to make the trade-offs visible.

Will it catch things our team is unlikely to have written down?

It will surface the absence. The review explicitly lists missing owners, missing approvals, unresolved risks, and undocumented support paths so you know where the holes are even if they are not in the plan.

Can I run this for a launch that already happened to do a postmortem?

Yes. Upload the original plan plus any retro notes and ask the agent to review readiness in hindsight. It will flag what was missed and what to add to your next launch template.